Citiţi partea introductivă şi proiectul de Program, iar dacă vă place, veniţi cu noi !

O puteţi face clicând alături imaginea, sau acest link

## Posts Tagged ‘Science’

## MULTIVERSE???

L wrote, “Someone was inspired tonight, but remember for every word you said there’s another you on the far side of the multiverse which said exactly the opposite words with the same conviction, and another you for all possible combinations in between.”

Remember, there’s no such thing as the multiverse. It’s a manmade fallacy that constitutes the biggest possible violation of Occam’s razor and the principle of sufficient reason. Only people that despise reason and logic believe in the Multiverse – the wet dream of the clowns that believe that existence can randomly pop out of non-existence for no reason, via no mechanism, to no purpose.

The Multiverse is every bit as miraculous and magical as “God”. In fact, it’s just the atheist materialist’s version of God. Instead of saying, “God (Design) is responsible” for whatever, the atheist materialist says, “The Multiverse (Randomness) is responsible”.

The atheist materialists have merely replaced God, the supposed eternal Creator, with infinite random creation out of nothing at all – an even worse idea, and totally irrational.

Randomness is just another name for irreducible CHAOS. According to irrational people, Order magically appears out of Chaos. According to rationalists, Order has always existed and only ordered things are possible.

Given a reality governed by the principle of sufficient reason (absolute rationalism), randomness is impossible since randomness, by definition, is that which lacks a sufficient reason. There has been no idea more damaging to science than the irrational assertion of empiricists that randomness exists. No one can perceive randomness. It is a non-empirical hypothesis, and any claim that anything happened randomly can automatically be reinterpreted in terms of sufficient reasons, i.e. total NON-randomness. Will you choose random (irrational) non-explanations, or rational explanations? Your choice.

Anyone who opposes the PSR is irrational. Science opposes the PSR and champions randomness. Science is irrational. Science irrationally uses mathematics, the quintessential rationalist subject, the very fact of which demonstrates that randomness is impossible.

Randomness is exactly that which is mathematically IMPOSSIBLE. No mathematical formula or argument could ever be presented to explain randomness. Mathematics is entirely predicated on the PSR.

## Hyperian History Of The World (20th Century, Part 2)

Hyperian History Of The World (20th Century, Part 2)

The chaos of 20th century science showed clearly all of the problems with human academia. The ancient Greek philosophers had been very aware of their own individual existence as being one individual part of the whole of existence, and the temple of Apollo at Delphi had been inscribed with the words ‘Know Thyself’, showing how much importance had been placed on understanding one’s own self in order to understand the rest of existence.

Unfortunately, since then human academia had become severely fractured and splintered, almost certainly due to the malevolent effects of irrational religions and the dominance of the old world powers over humanity. The Greek philosophers were not only philosophers, but also scientists, mathematicians, psychologists, politicians, artists, all in one. 20th century academics, on the other hand, may have been experts in one field, but tended to be utterly ignorant of other fields, thus severely limiting what they were able to understand about their chosen field. Without the right philosophical underpinning, science had descended into madness, a madness from which it has still yet to emerge.

A big problem was that scientists did not ‘know themselves’ as per the Apollonian inscription. Scientists tended to be extrovert empiricists, looking out into the physical world around them, making observations with their senses and drawing their conclusions based only on this. This had the effect of creating a worldview which alienates the universe from the individuals who inhabit it. Quantum Mechanics was entirely founded on the ‘observer’ yet at no point was the ‘observer’ given any kind of definition. Scientists could make no sense of the mind of the individual, and indeed, many scientists didn’t even acknowledge the existence of such a mind, given that it was not observable.

The main reason scientists failed to appreciate their own shortcomings, was because of a major lack of psychological understanding. It was ironic then, that at about the same time as Relativity and Quantum Mechanics were being developed, Psychology was becoming a major academic discipline, thanks mostly to two giants of the field, Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung.

Sigmund Freud developed a model of the mind, or the psyche, consisting of three major parts, the Id, the Ego and the Super Ego.

The Id is the more primitive, instinctual part of the psyche. This is the part of us which selfishly seeks pleasure and is mostly unconscious. All of our base instincts, all of our primitive desires, these are of the Id. The Id wants what it wants, and it wants it now. The Id has no regard for the desires of anyone else, indeed, it is hardly even aware of the existence of anyone else, such is its selfishness. To get what it wants, the Id will do anything, it will fight off anyone or anything that gets in its way. The Id has a very narrow view of the world, seeing its way only to the next source of pleasure. It has no concept of the wider world, no concept of the past or the future. It lives permanently in the moment and seeks only to maximise the pleasure it feels in that moment.

The Id is contrasted by the Super Ego. The Super Ego is selfless, and is concerned with the world at large. The Super Ego is very aware of other people and of the rules and conventions of the society in which it lives. It wishes to live by those rules and conventions and to do no harm to anyone else. More than this, the Super Ego seeks to perfect the world around it and everyone else in it. It wants what is best for everyone and it will help others often at its own expense. It is highly aware of the past and of the future; it learns from the past in order to create a better future.

The Ego is the part of the psyche which mediates between the two others. The desires of the Id so often contradict those of the Super Ego and vice versa, therefore the Ego has a very difficult job. Most of the time, the Ego makes its decisions quickly or even unconsciously, resulting in compromises which don’t particularly satisfy either the Id or the Super Ego. If the Id and the Super Ego represent the fracture of the psyche, the Ego, when it operates in this manner, doesn’t really heal the fracture at all but, rather, it merely suppresses both the Id and the Super Ego and this only really serves to maintain the current state of fracture. Most people are dissatisfied with their lives, their Id is not receiving its pleasure, yet neither is their Super Ego contributing to creating a better world.

In order for the Ego to do a better job, it must become more conscious of what it is doing. Then, rather than merely finding a compromise between the Id and Super Ego, it can instead seek a higher synthesis of the two, a state which satisfies both of them. This would result in progression, upward motion towards a higher state of existence.

We all have our unconscious Id selfishly striving for pleasure, and we all have our Super Ego, selflessly hoping to please everyone else in society. The conflict between the two must be addressed consciously by the Ego which must not merely compromise, but must find a higher Synthesis, just as in Hegel’s Dialectic. Only a highly conscious Ego can raise the Psyche to a higher level, healing the fracture and attaining to Unity.

Freud’s great rival was Carl Jung. Jung developed a model of the psyche more complicated than that of Freud. Like Freud, Jung recognised that the psyche contained elements that were both conscious and unconscious, and, like Freud, he recognised that there was conflict between various elements of the psyche, conflict that could be resolved, leading to a higher state of psychic health. Jung recognised, as per the Dialectic, that opposing elements had to be synthesised in order to lead to a higher level. This was a process Jung called Individuation.

For Jung, the Ego is the centre of our consciousness (yet not part of the unconscious). This is our everyday sense of who we are in this lifetime, a constant flow of experiences based upon our interaction with the physical world in our immediate surroundings. The Ego responds to the world around it using four functions: Sensing, Intuition, Feeling and Thinking. It also acts both introvertedly and extrovertedly. An individual Ego tends towards some of these functions more than others, leading to differing personality types.

Sensing is opposed by Intuition and Feeling is opposed by Thinking. Someone who is a sensing type is lees likely to use intuition and someone who is a feeling type is less like to use thinking, yet this is further complicated by whether they tend towards introversion or extroversion.

Based on these functions, the Ego responds to life in the physical world, yet it is only a small part of the whole psyche. The Ego only makes use of information which it has an immediate use for. Everything else is pushed down into the unconscious, or more specifically according to Jung, the Personal Unconscious.

Jung also developed the concept of what he called the Collective Unconscious. Whereas the Personal unconscious is specific to each individual, made up of all our experiences which have not been made conscious, the Collective Unconscious is a sort of psychological ‘blueprint’ common to all of us.

Jung did not believe that our minds were ‘blank’ when we are born and then are populated with ideas as we grow, rather, he realised that our minds all contain the same pieces of information from the start, information which is experienced differently for each of us depending on our experiences.

The Collective Unconscious is populated with what Jung called Archetypes. Every mind contains the same archetypes, we simply experience them in different ways, based on our differing lives and culture etc. Yet we recognise the archetypes in others, archetypes such as the Mother, the Father, the Teacher, The Wise Old Man, the Ally, the Enemy, the Lover etc.

Jung also identified other elements of the Psyche:

1) The Persona. This is the version of yourself that you present publicly to other people. It is the part of you which conforms to the customs of your society. We all have elements of our psyches which society might deem to be unacceptable, and we hide these things behind the Persona, or mask. The Persona is a thin veil yet it is easy to identify too strongly with it, forgetting who you really are.

2) The Shadow. Many of the elements that we hide behind the Persona, the things which society deems unacceptable, or the aspects of ourselves which we do not like, are all repressed into the Shadow. Therefore, our Shadow is the complete opposite of the Persona, an aspect of the psyche from which we are alienated. Often, we recognise elements of our shadow in others, causing us to strongly dislike them when, in fact, we are simply recognising something of ourselves in them, something which we do not like about ourselves. This is called projection. A crucial part of individuation is to integrate the Shadow, to realise that these elements are still a part of you and to overcome the alienation we feel towards our Shadow.

3) The Anima/Animus. This is the part of the psyche based upon the opposite sex, Anima in a man and Animus in a woman. To identify as one gender is to lead a one-sided existence. Like the Shadow, the Anima/Animus must be integrated in order to heal the fracture of the psyche. Also like the Shadow, we project the contents of our Anima/Animus onto others of the opposite sex, recognising in them the elements of our ideal woman or man, when really these are elements of ourselves which we must integrate.

Finally, Jung spoke of the Self. The Self is the deepest part of our psyche and the part most alienated from the Ego, yet the Self is indeed our True Self, it is who we truly are. Prior to individuation, the Self would seem utterly strange and foreign to us, we would never believe it to be our true self, so alienated are we from it. Yet after successful individuation, after integrating the Shadow and the Anima/Animus and all the other aspects of the psyche, our identification shifts from the Ego to the Self, or, rather, the Self absorbs all other elements of the psyche, alienation ceases, all conflicts are resolved and we become whole, we attain to Unity.

Unfortunately, despite the highly influential work of these great psychologists, 20th century scientists, philosophers and mathematicians remained in a state of fracture, alienated and separated from one another, focused solely on their own narrow field. They failed to understand their need for each other, their need for unity, because they had failed to ‘know themselves’.

Brice Merci – hyperian

## What Constitutes Existence?

What Constitutes Existence?

Many philosophers and religious thinkers have proposed endless ways to describe the basic nature of existence. So, let’s play the God Game. If you were God, which of the following options would you have chosen? We shall take an incredible tour of the multitude of options available to God.

Materialism: “The world … is corporeal, that is to say, body … and every part of the universe is body, and that which is not body is no part of the universe.” – Thomas Hobbes

Idealism: Everything is mental; the material world is ultimately mental.

Panpsychism: all matter has a mental aspect; mind is everywhere; all entities have a unified centre of experience; all entities have their own unique point of view (perspective); all parts of matter involve mind, or more holistically, the whole universe is an organism that possesses a mind; the idea that all matter is imbued with some (greater or lesser) form of consciousness.

The distinction between idealism and panpsychism is that the latter treats everything as mind or as containing mind whereas the former treats things as content of the mind. In panpsychism, a rock, for example, has a mind (albeit rudimentary and unconscious) whereas in idealism, a rock has no independent material existence but is merely a mental phenomenon – an idea in a mind. In panpsychism, a rock doesn’t vanish if the mind perceiving it dies. In idealism, the rock is dependent in the mind’s perception of it, so “dies” when the mind dies. In other words, panpsychism allows for the objective existence of things whereas idealism is purely subjective (all apparently objective things are contained within subjective minds, and do not exist without the subjective minds that sustain them).

Illuminism agrees with idealism that mind and not matter is the basis of reality, but Illuminism is fundamentally an expression of panpsychism. “Panpsychism is the view that the basic physical constituents of the universe have mental properties” — Thomas Nagel

Dualism: the view that mind and matter have independent existence and neither is reliant on the other or originates from the other.

Panpsychism is sometimes seen as dualist since it attributes mind to matter, thus acknowledging the objective existence of matter, and regards everything as having both mental and physical properties. In Illuminism, mind and matter are both mathematical and matter is in some sense “solid” mind i.e. matter is an expression of mind. It has different mathematical characteristics: above all the number zero is excluded from material existence yet defines mental existence.

“In the matter of consciousness, the position of Empedocles may be defined as a rigorous panpsychism. In his view, which seems to be shared to some degree by most early Greek thinkers, the faculty of feeling, perception, and thought does not constitute a prerogative of men and animals, but is assumed to be distributed generally throughout the natural world. From this point of view, there is really no such thing as inanimate nature. The character of any object is conceived of as a vital urge that may be described in terms of thought and volition. This conception is analogous to the ‘animism’ which is said to characterise the attitude of many primitive peoples in their dealings with nature. But the animism of Empedocles is scarcely primitive: it is explicitly formulated as a philosophic principle. He ends the poem On Nature with a warning to his friend Pausanias that the truths communicated must be carefully borne in mind, or else they will leave you all at once, when their times come round, yearning after their fellows, to return to their own dear kind; for know that all things have intelligence and a share in thought. This statement implies a systematic parallelism between physical objects and mental conceptions. Not only does everything have a share in thought, but every thought is treated like a thing. Apparently Empedocles recognizes no radical distinction between the two, for the constituents of the physical world and our perception of this world are described in the same terms:

By earth we behold earth, by water water,

by air bright air, by fire, ravaging fire,

love by love and strife by gloomy strife.

For out of these are all things compounded

and fitted together and with these do they think

and feel pleasure and pain.”

— Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Edited by John P. Anton with George L. Kustas

Reductive panpsychism reduces all material properties to mind.

Reductive physicalism does the opposite and reduces everything to matter.

Reductive physicalism is essentially materialism: everything in the world can be reduced analytically to its fundamental physical, or material, basis. All mental states and processes can be reduced to physical states and processes. All organic and inorganic processes can be explained by reference to the laws of physical nature.

Illuminism, on the other hand, reduces everything, mental and material, to mathematics and asserts that all organic and inorganic processes can be explained with regard to mathematical laws of existence.

Neutral monism: this is the view that the mental and the material are two different perspectives of the same underlying thing, which is itself “neutral” i.e. neither physical nor mental. So, this stance rejects the view that the mental and the physical are two fundamentally different things and asserts that there is only one fundamental “stuff” in the universe (hence why it’s a monism). Neutral monism was first propounded by Spinoza who proposed that mind and matter were two attributes of God (the underlying monism), although Spinoza’s view might better be called dual-aspect monism:

“In strict parlance, neutral monism should be distinguished from dual-aspect monism, which holds that all existence consists of one kind (hence monism) of primal substance, which in itself is neither mental nor physical, but is capable of distinct mental and physical aspects or attributes that are two faces of the same underlying reality in the one substance. … The theory’s relationship to neutral monism is ill-defined, but one proffered distinction says that whereas neutral monism allows the context of a given group of neutral elements to determine whether the group is mental, physical, both, or neither, double-aspect theory requires the mental and the physical to be inseparable and irreducible (though distinct).” — Wikipedia

Schopenhauer, like Spinoza, is a dual-aspect monist. In Schopenhauer’s philosophy, there is only one substance (Will), but it manifests itself physically (phenomenally) and mentally (noumenally), with each being the flip side of the other.

Illuminism might be considered a dual-aspect monism. Mathematics is the ground of existence (the monism) and takes the form of infinite mathematical points, inbuilt with the laws of mathematics. Since a monad is a rudimentary mind, mind and mathematics are intimately connected. Mind can be considered as subjective mathematics – how it feels to be a mathematical entity; the inside perspective; the inner experience – while matter is objective mathematics, subject to the laws of what humanity calls science. Subjective mathematics is the within of mathematics while objective mathematics is the without.

It is a primary axiom of Illuminism that all of the fundamental units of existence are subjective when experienced internally and objective when viewed externally. Everything is a subject to itself, but an object to everything else. If a subject acquires a body (as in a human being) then that constitutes its objective presence in the world, while the mind is its subjective presence.

William James also developed a neutral monist view, and is perhaps the classic expression of that view. Bertrand Russell said, “James’s view is that the raw material out of which the world is built up is not of two sorts, one matter and the other mind, but that it is arranged in different patterns by its inter-relations, and that some arrangements may be called mental, while others may be called physical.”

Panpsychism can be readily combined with neutral monism. Illuminism is the stance that mathematics is the basis of mind and matter, hence mathematics is the neutral monism in that sense. Each mathematical point is regarded both as a unique mind and as fundamental building block of the material world. (Many of these definitions flow in and out of each other or form a continuum rather than clear-cut distinctions.)

Holism: the view that the whole Universe is an organism that possesses a mind. Equivalent to a certain view of panpsychism.

Animism (from Latin anima “soul, life, mind, breath”; similar in concept to Greek words such as psyche and pneuma): the view that all things have a soul; all animate and inanimate objects possess individual, innate souls; the hypothesis first advanced by Pythagoras and later promoted by Plato that an immaterial force animates the universe (the World Soul).

Animism is the belief that non-human entities are spiritual beings, or embody a life-principle. In this view, there is no separation between the spiritual and physical worlds. Souls/spirits exist not just in humans, but also in all other animals, plants, rocks, and all natural phenomena. Thunder and lightning have souls. Mountains, rivers, woods, stars, planets, galaxies, black holes – they all have souls. The universe is a vast network of ensouled creatures. Personalized supernatural beings (or souls) occupy all objects and govern their existence. Just as a human body is said to have a soul, all bodies of any type at all (including inorganic bodies) also have souls, although of very different mental character. Animism is the view that spirits inhabit the universe in all of its parts.

Extreme animism attributes souls even to abstractions such as words, true names (which have tremendous power in the occult world), and mythological symbols. Shinto, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Pantheism and Neopaganism all have significant animistic tendencies.

Illuminism is a type of animism since it teaches that living (but unconscious) monads are the source of everything in the world. However, while animism assigns consciousness to all things, Illuminism does not. Illuminism is about the unconscious mind evolving towards consciousness as its highest manifestation.

In Illuminism, unconscious monads are the building blocks of existence. Existence is predicated on fundamental units of mathematical life. Ontological mathematics is alive. All mathematical functions and signals produce an inner experience in the living monads affected by them.

Animism was the first religious system conceived by the human mind and, when equated with ontological mathematics, becomes supremely powerful. However, when associated with primitive beliefs and superstitions, it degenerates into the monotheistic Abrahamic system that there is one single and all-unifying animating force in the universe – God, the Creator.

Abrahamism is animism taken to its extreme position in terms of conscious design of the universe. Illuminism is animism taken to its extreme position in terms of unconscious, teleological evolution of the universe.

Science disregards animism completely, and is thereby incapable of explaining how life comes from non-life. It should be noted that life/non-life dualism is just another way of talking about the mind-body problem. Life and mind are effectively synonymous. You are alive if you have a mind, even if that mind is rudimentary and unconscious.

Illuminism solves mind-body dualism by demonstrating that the body originates in mind (i.e. there is no separate material world). It solves the life/non-life problem by demonstrating that everything is alive (i.e. there’s no kingdom of dead things that are somehow assembled like Frankenstein’s monster into living beings). Existence MUST be monistic. There can be no existential dualism.

Science claims to be a monistic materialism, but philosophically it is radically dualistic since it cannot offer any viable mechanism to account for how mind comes from non-mind or life from non-life. Although science claims that life and mind are materialistic phenomena that originate in more elemental materialistic phenomena, in reality the gulf between mind and non-mind and life and non-life is infinite.

Descartes’ philosophy failed because of its dualism. Either matter must be fully explained by mind, or mind by matter. Illuminism is the proof that matter is ultimately mental and not physical. Science, on the other hand, has wholly failed to prove that mind is ultimately material.

Excerpt from The God Game

Mike Hockney

Artwork by Yuliya Zelinskaya

Tags: Animism, Descartes, Dualism, Holism, Idealism, Illuminism, Materialism, Monism, Panpsychism, Physicalism, Science

## MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

# MY RELIGION IS PYTHAGOREAN ILLUMINISM

**A Quick Thank You To The Pythagorean Illuminati And Khan Academy**

“The Singularity is the Cartesian origin. It’s the frequency (mental) domain at the heart of the spacetime (material) domain. You can *never *validly refer to spacetime without also referring to the Singularity. This, in fact, is the whole problem with science. Science, even though it acknowledges the spacetime universe erupting from a Singularity at the Big Bang, then denies the ongoing existence of this Singularity (which in fact goes on controlling spacetime as the Cosmic Mind to the Cosmic Body = universe).”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

I was recently able to complete all of the lessons and exercises in the differential calculus section of Khan Academy’s AP Calculus BC course (I’m not sure what the hell AP Calculus BC even stands for, but it was the most in depth calculus course on Khan Academy, so it’s the course I’ve been working on), and I couldn’t be more excited! I’m just now beginning my journey into integral calculus, and I’m currently studying the basics of how to use left and right Riemann sums to find the area under a curve. Again, this is all super exciting for me, and I would like to start this blog post off by saying thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati and Khan Academy. It is thanks to these two groups of hard working meritocrats that I’ve been able to accomplish something I wasn’t sure I was capable of, namely, learning calculus.

I was having a relatively smooth journey through differential calculus and then, as usual, I hit the word problems and my smooth progress became a bit bumpy. Man alive, those calculus word problems were challenging for me. Sometimes it would take me an entire day to solve a single problem. The awesome thing is that I was usually able to find the solution or solutions to those tricky and long problems, and each time I was successful with my answer, it would get me more pumped up than I would be after winning a hard fought Mixed Martial Arts bout. If becoming skilled at mathematics doesn’t get your juices flowing, then either you haven’t read all of the books that comprise Mike Hockney’s *God Series *and Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series* (i.e. the books written by the Pythagorean Illuminati), or there is simply something wrong with your juices.

Just for a little fun, here is the last problem in the last exercise module in Khan Academy’s differential calculus course that I did before completing the course: “In a restaurant, the daily menu is mounted on wallboard. The printed region with today’s entrees include 216 square inches of text. If there are two-inch margins on the sides and three-inch margins at the bottom and the top, what are the dimensions of the smallest piece of wallboard that can be used for the menu?” Luckily for me, by the time I got to this particular problem I was starting to get the hang of solving these types of calculus word problems, so it only took me hours to solve as opposed to days! In case you’re curious, the smallest possible piece of wallboard that can be used for this restaurant’s menu turned out to be 16 inches by 24 inches. What a cool and fun differential calculus word problem!

Anyway, I’ve been working to be able to learn calculus ever since I was fortunate enough to discover the sacred books of ontological mathematics and Pythagorean Illuminism seven years ago, and completing Differential Calculus on Khan Academy has been a goal of mine for these past seven years. Being able to finally accomplish this goal is absolutely exhilarating for me.

So, to begin with, I would like to say thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything they have done, and continue to do, for the people of this planet. I want to say thank you to them for teaching me the mathematical Truth of reality. If it weren’t for these brilliant authors and their selfless work, I would never have been able to realize that mathematics defines reality because mathematics *is *reality, and hence I would never have began studying mathematics, which is the greatest and healthiest possible workout a person can do for their mind because mathematics *is *mind.

Studying mathematics is doing for my mind what studying Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts does for my body, i.e. mathematics is making my mind stronger and stronger. Seven years ago, I wouldn’t have been able to understand what the definition of a derivative even means (note: in abstract mathematics, derivatives are the focus of differential calculus; they give you the slope of the tangent line to any point on a curve, which can also be thought of as the instantaneous rate of change of a function at any point along its curve), but now, thanks to the Illuminati’s ultra-inspiring work, I have been able to complete the full differential calculus course on Khan Academy, and, as I mentioned above, am just now beginning to learn integral calculus.

Honestly, a few years ago I was slightly intimidated by mathematics, and I wasn’t quite sure that my punch addled brain could even handle higher levels of math like calculus. I say “punch addled” because I was a professional Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) fighter for quite a few years, and over that time I took many a blow to the old noggin.

A quick aside here: As I mentioned above, the practice of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and Mixed Martial Arts, if done in an intelligent and controlled manner, can be beneficial to a person’s health and well being. They can help make your physical body stronger and healthier. Professional Mixed Martial Arts competition is another story entirely though. Professional Mixed Martial Arts is never intelligent nor controlled, and damage to the physical body (especially the brain from all of the head blows) is inevitable. This damage is accrued through the ridiculous amount of ridiculously rough fight training a fighter does to prepare for a fight, as well as the actual violent fight itself.

If I remember correctly, I ended my MMA competition days with 29 pro MMA bouts, 4 no rules challenge matches at the gym I trained at (these matches were fights where some weirdo or weirdos would come into the gym where I trained from off the street and want to “test” themselves by fighting one of the gym’s trained fighters, which sometimes was me), too many grappling competitions for me to remember, and, last but not least, all of the crazy training that went along with these competitions. It is from all of these martial arts competitions, plus all the competition training and preparation, that the vast majority of my lingering injuries came from. One of the biggest problems I’ve had since I stopped competing in MMA is nasty headaches that occur frequently.

It is because of all the times my brain got raddled around inside of my head that I was slightly concerned about whether or not I would be able to understand and solve calculus problems. These negative thoughts should have never entered my mind. Studying mathematics has been nothing but beneficial for me. So far I have had no problems learning and understanding any of the math concepts I have studied on Khan Academy. I think the damage I did to my brain via too many years spent fighting other human beings in a cage is actually healing up because of mathematics study. I am thinking MUCH clearer than I did prior to finding the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ipso facto beginning to truly study mathematics, and my headaches are becoming less painful and less frequent. For this, I cannot thank the Illuminati enough. My brain and I are testament to the universal Truth that the diligent study of True mathematics, reason, and logic (i.e. the diligent study of *ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS*) can literally *heal *the damaged mental state of humanity.

So, one more time because it simply can’t be said enough: Thank you to the Pythagorean Illuminati for everything. You have saved the souls of myself and many other people through your incredible books. Humanity owes you everything. One day in the not too distant future, a rational, intelligent, logical, mathematical, meritocratic, wise, creative, artistic, altruistic, compassionate, brave, strong, and united humanity will celebrate the mentally liberating work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. That day can’t come soon enough.

Before I move along, I would also like to quickly thank the great Sal Khan and his amazing (and free) online school–Khan Academy. This website makes studying mathematics on your own SO much easier. Khan Academy takes a student by the hand and leads her through all of the concepts of mathematics. It lets a student practice and master each concept via its amazing exercise modules, and it does all of this for free.

Khan Academy doesn’t only teach math though. No, it is an entire online educational academy, and you can study almost any subject you’re interested in on it. The site is constantly updated with fresh material and content, and brand new lectures, lessons, and exercise modules are being added to it all the time. I just can’t say enough about this incredible website.

If you are an Illuminist, a Hyperian, an ontological mathematician, a rationalist, a Pythagorean, a Leibnizian, a Hegelian, a Platonist, a reader of Mike Hockney’s *God Series *or Dr. Thomas Stark’s *Truth Series*, or somebody who simply wants to improve your knowledge and understanding of mathematics and science, then Khan Academy is the place for you. I’m a retired MMA fighter with a shitty high school education who started on Khan Academy all the way back at its elementary school mathematics courses (which I could barely remember how to do at the time!), and am now entering integral calculus! It is very exciting! So, if you’ve got free time on your hands and feel like doing some learning, stop by Khan Academy and give it a try. I think you’ll be amazed by the amount of excellent educational content you find there.

**Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Abstract’ mathematicians have no understanding of the greatest tool in mathematics–calculus. Calculus, without reference to Leibnizian monads–is absurd. Leibniz, the discoverer of calculus, and the greatest genius in human history, was the only person who fully understood calculus, and the fact that it must be intrinsically tied to monads. The rest of the matheamtical community, while accepting Leibniz’s notation and basic approach to calculus (bar the monads!) essentially followed Newton’s spacetime (scientific) understanding of calculus.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Since I’m currently in the midst of learning calculus, and it is very much on my mind at the moment, I thought this might be a good time to talk about what it is that calculus is telling us about reality*. *In other words, I would like to take some time to think about the ontological significance of calculus, both differential and integral calculus. But before I get into thinking about ontological calculus specifically, I would first like to talk a little bit about ontological mathematics in general.

Now, it’s super fun (and very handy) to be able to figure out a calculus word problem like the one from Khan Academy I wrote out above. That’s what mathematics does for a conscious mind after all: it strengthens it up to the point that it is able to use math, reason and logic to solve any and all problems concerning reality, no matter how non-mathematical they might seem to be.

But why should this be? I mean, why should mathematics be able to answer *any *questions we humans might come up with concerning space, time, and matter, much less *all *questions? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* we look? Why is it totally ubiquitous throughout the Cosmos? Why can it be used to describe our entire universe with such pinpoint accuracy? Why do empirical scientific materialists rely on non-sensory mathematics to explain all of their sensory experiments? Why would scientific materialism and empiricism, which purports to study reality via experimentation, completely fall apart without the non-material, non-empirical, non-experimental, and hyper-rational mathematics that underpins it?

I’m not joking in the least when I say that all of life’s most mysterious and important questions will be answered for the human race if we can just pull our collective head out of our collective ass, and at long last see the Truth of mathematics. This sacred and profound Truth has been staring us in the face ever since we became conscious beings inside of the cosmos, indeed, the great Pythagoras intuited and revealed this Truth to us some 2500 years ago. But of course we didn’t listen.

It is precisely because humanity was (and still is) unwilling to listen to the genius words of Pythagoras that it fell victim, over and over again, to evil confidence men and charlatans such as Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ, Muhammad, the Buddah, etc. Humanity’s dark and sordid past is entirely due to these sick individuals and the evil religions and ideologies they shit out. Throughout our history, these vile religions and irrational systems of thought have ruined our minds, and, along with them, our world. It is precisely because of these ancient, decrepit, idiotic, irrational, and completely *evil*religions that we human beings have NEVER been able to make any kind of connection to the 100% mathematical Truth of the universe.

It is more important now than ever for the human race to discover the Truth of itself and the universe, and this Truth begins and ends with discovering the Truth of mathematics. It is the Truth of mathematics, reason, and logic that will free us all from our self imposed chains, and allow us all to step out of the cave of darkness and complacent ignorance, into the light of knowledge. Seeing all of this, it becomes imperative for humanity to be able to correctly answer the questions concerning mathematics and scientific materialism that I wrote a few paragraphs above. Answering these profound questions correctly is quite literally the most important thing humanity can do for itself at this dark moment in time.

Alright, let’s think for a minute. What are the answers to these most important of questions concerning the origins and ontology of mathematics? Why is mathematics found absolutely *everywhere* in the universe*,* and why does it answer absolutely all questions concerning the universe *perfectly? *Surely you don’t think human scientists and mathematicians *invented* mathematics, do you? If you do think this, then I have a few more questions for you. Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *Pi*? Which scientist or mathematician invented the number *e*? If humans invented math, then why don’t they know where numbers such as Pi and e end? Which scientist or mathematician invented a sine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented a cosine wave? Which scientist or mathematician invented that the angles of a triangle in Euclidean geometry always add up to 180 degrees? Which scientist or mathematician invented conic sections? Which scientist or mathematician invented the unit circle? Which scientist or mathematician invented the Pythagorean Theorem? Which scientist or mathematician invented Euler’s formula and equation? I could go on and on but I think you get the point.

So, can you tell me which scientist or mathematician invented *anything* at all in mathematics? You can’t because absolutely no scientist or mathematician ever has, or ever *could, *invent anything in mathematics. The only thing about mathematics that human scientists and mathematicians have ever “invented” is all of the fallacious and false ways that humanity, as a species, has come to *define* and *interpret* mathematics; ways entirely predicated on the fallible and dysfunctional human sensory apparatus and human sensory experiments; ways such as the tedious and boring *Set Theory *of conventional, abstract mathematics. And we wonder why most kids have no interest in studying math at school.

Let’s get this straight right now: It’s absolutely IMPOSSIBLE for any mind, human or otherwise, to invent ANYTHING in mathematics. So again I ask you: Why is mathematics perfect for solving all problems, and why does it completely saturate our universe? There can only be one answer to these life changing questions, and that answer is that humans don’t *invent *mathematics, they *discover *it.

Humanity *discovers *mathematics all throughout the cosmos precisely because space, time, matter, and indeed the entire universe, are completely derived from, made out of, and created by mathematics. Mathematics is eternal. It is the permanent foundation that reality is built on top of. Mathematics *is *reality. This is why mathematics explains EVERYTHING. It even explains all of the things you mistakenly think are inexplicable–things such as the soul and the afterlife. In fact, once you understand mathematics the way it’s supposed to be understood, i.e. ontologically, seemingly supernatural things such as the aforementioned soul and afterlife become as natural as 1+1=2.

A proper understanding of mathematics will bring humanity a proper understanding of religion. Absolutely all of the questions of religion can be definitively answered by mathematics. This is why mathematics, when properly understood by humanity, will totally free us from the mental prison built by all of our deadly, story based religions (including the story based religions of free market capitalism and its good buddy scientific materialism). Once humanity collectively discovers the Truth of mathematics, it will ipso facto become a liberated species.

The Truth of mathematics is that it is ontological. It is *real. *It is *all* that is real. It completely defines what can actually be *known*. Mathematics IS ontology AND epistemology. Mathematics IS science. Physics comes from mathematics, chemistry comes from physics, and biology comes from chemistry. Do you see how everything is based on mathematics?

Mathematics is the basis and foundation of ALL science. It is the basis and foundation of ALL philosophy. It is the basis and foundation of ALL psychology. It is the basis and foundation of ALL thought. It is the basis and foundation of ALL emotions. It is the basis and foundation of ALL sensations. Mathematics is the eternal, necessary, complete, and consistent basis and foundation of *REALITY. * This is why mathematics is found absolutely everywhere we look in the universe, and it is why mathematics perfectly answers all questions about the universe. The universe is literally *made *out of mathematics because it *is *mathematics.

**Pythagorean Illuminism = The Study Of Ontological Mathematics**

“‘Spacetime (material) calculus is formally false. Only spacetime calculus grounded in frequency (mental) calculus is valid, i.e. calculus must be underpinned by monadic frequency domains located in a Singularity, sited at the origin of the Cartesian coordinate grid. All calculus processes must refer to this invisible Singularity.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Pythagorean Illuminism is my religion. It is the philosophy and ideology that guides my life. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is entirely unlike any other religion, philosophy, or ideology out there. You see, Pythagorean Illuminism is the world’s only Logos religion. This means it is a religion that uses math, science, reason, and logic to understand what is going on in the universe as opposed to stories. Story based religions are Mythos religions, and they currently rule our world. Pythagorean Illuminism is a religion, philosophy, and ideology that is fully based on mathematics, reason and logic, and it contends that mathematics, when interpreted and understood properly, perfectly answers each and every question concerning the universe and reality.

In Pythagorean Illuminsim, True mathematics, i.e. the mathematics of reality, is called *ontological mathematics* (alternatively it is termed *Illuminism, **Hyperianism,* *mathematical idealism*, *scientific rationalism and idealism*, *wave mathematics, monadic mathematics, *or *transcendental mathematics*), and it is ontological mathematics that forms the unbreakable foundation that the religion of Pythagorean Illuminism is built on top of. Absolutely all other religions, philosophies, and ideologies found on this planet are, in one way or another, based on Mythos, i.e. they are based on irrational and absurd *stories, *hence they are ALL FALSE. Stories don’t and can’t explain, define, or create anything, only mathematics can do that, therefore: Pythagorean Illuminism is THE ONLY TRUE RELIGION, PHILOSOPHY, AND IDEOLOGY BAR NONE, period.

Ontological mathematics is the study of mathematics *as* reality, and Pythagorean Illuminism is the study of ontological mathematics. Pythagorean Illuminism and ontological mathematics have been introduced to the world by a team of brilliant writers. These writers are experts at rational and logical thinking, i.e. they are experts in mathematics, science, philosophy, and psychology, and their work 100% reflects this fact. This genius writing team is a communication cell of the most enigmatic secret society to ever exist on this planet: The Pythagorean Illuminati.

This single communication cell of the Illuminati has written many different books and many different book series, all of which are available for purchase on *Amazon *(note: for those who are interested, I have left links to the Pythagorean Illuminati’s *Amazon *author pages at the end of this blog post). The writing team writes using a few different pseudonyms. If you’re ever confused about whether or not a book is an official book of the Pythagorean Illuminati and ontological mathematics, then check the *Amazon* author pages or head on over to the Illuminati’s amazing website where a full list of their books can be found. The official website of the Pythagorean Illuminati is http://www.armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

If you’re fucking sick and tired of the self serving lies being vomited out on a daily basis by all of humanity’s Mythos religions, Mythos political parties, Mythos philosophies, and Mythos ideologies, then you might be a human being who is receptive to the Truth of reality, i.e. you might be a human being who is receptive to Pythagorean Illuminism = Ontological Mathematics. If this is you, then become an Illuminist. Go out and pick up your first book by the Pythagorean Illuminati and prepare to come face to face with your *Soul.*

**Ontological Calculus**

“We need a brand new understanding of the Cartesian coordinate grid. It needs to have an ontological Singularity–a Mind–placed at its origin. The Singularity is the Fourier frequency domain, and the rest of the grid the Fourier spacetime domain. The Big Bang is nothing but a Fourier process creating spacetime from the frequency Singularity (the Cartesian origin). The Cartesian grid must be replaced by the Fourier-Cartesian grid, reflecting frequency as well as spacetime.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

Please note that I will be performing some calculus and some ontological interpretations of calculus in this next section of my blog post. Any mathematical or philosophical mistakes I make in this section are entirely my own, and have nothing to do with the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati.

If you would like a detailed look at ontological calculus written by experts and not an ex-MMA fighter, then I would advice you to read *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati. This book contains invaluable information concerning ontological calculus, and it was the inspiration for this blog post.

I’m currently reading *How to Create the Universe* again because of my recent calculus studies, and it’s helping me to get the hang of the differences between abstract calculus and ontological calculus. These differences revolve around the real existence of the hyper-rational Monadic Collective Singularity, i.e. the Cosmic Mind, i.e. MATHEMATICS AS IT TRULY IS, which is situated at the exact center of the universe. Of course, abstract mathematics and empirical scientific materialism both deny the existence of any such universe controlling Mind, which is exactly why abstract mathematics and scientific materialism are ultimately *irrational* subjects.

Here is a link to *How to Create the Universe* for anyone who is interested:

Now back to calculus. At the top of one of the previous segments of this blog post, before I veered off and started ranting about idiotic and evil Mythos religion (which I tend to do a lot!), I mentioned I wanted to think a little bit about the ontological significance of calculus. Now, as you can probably imagine, calculus, both differential and integral, plays a HUGE roll in the workings of the universe and reality. In fact, calculus and Fourier wave mathematics explain and define absolutely ALL of reality.

We are all here in space and time. This means we are all currently inhabiting a dimensional domain of what scientific materialists term *matter. *Contrary to what mainstream science says, the domain of space and time is a six dimensional domain consisting of three real/space dimensions and three imaginary/time dimensions. But where do these space and time dimensions derive from? Rationally, non-dimensionality is the only thing that can exist. So where does dimensionality come from? Or, to be a bit more precise, where does the 100% mathematically defined *illusion* of dimensionality come from? Further, once spacetime dimensionality is established within the cosmos, how does it (i.e. dimsionality) return to non-dimensionality? In other words, how does the *Big Crunch *produce the *Big Bang, *and similarly, how does the *Big Bang *in turn produce the *Big Crunch? *This is where differential and integral calculus come into play.* *

You see calculus, when understood properly and ontologically, is precisely what allows *dimensionality *to be added to and subtracted from reality. The preeminent philosophers and ontological mathematicians, Mike Hockney and Dr. Thomas Stark (a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati), refer to calculus as a *dimensionality stepladder. *This ingenious metaphor helps out tremendously when trying to visualize what is happening mathematically within the universe.

Calculus is the controller of dimensionality. Calculus shows us how the Monadic Collective Singularity (i.e. the collection of all our individual minds/souls, which exist outside of space and time within a zero-dimension domain of pure light) mathematically creates and adds dimensionality to reality via integration (which is studied in integral calculus), and how it mathematically erases and subtracts dimensionality from reality via differentiation (which is studied in differential calculus).

This can all be gleaned by studying calculus with an eye for ontology (i.e. studying calculus after studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati). When you look at calculus ontologically, you can begin to get an idea of what is going on in the universe. Let’s take a few minutes to think about differentiation (subtracting dimensions) and integration (adding dimensions), and what they are telling us about reality.

Let’s first take a look at differentiation. To be simple, let’s take the expression x cubed (i.e. x^3), which is graphed above, and let’s see what happens when we differentiate it a few times. Before we differentiate this thing, let’s say that x^3 is some sort of dimensional expression of mathematics. For now, it doesn’t matter what x^3 ontologically *is* within the domain of dimensionality, it just matters that we are thinking of this expression as a dimensional expression.

Now, when we differentiate x^3 once, we end up with 3x squared (i.e. 3x^2) as a solution. After our first differentiation, we can see that we have went from an expression raised to the third power to an expression raised to the second power. Continuing along, we can go ahead and differentiate 3x^2 next, i.e. we can differentiate our original expression x^3 for a second time. When we do this, we end up with 6x as a solution. We can see that, after this second differentiation, we again decremented our exponent by one. Now, if we differentiate our original expression x^3 for a third time, i.e. if we differentiate 6x, we end up with the number 6 as a solution. We can again see that differentiation has caused our original function’s exponent to be decremented by one (x^0 = 1, so 6 = 6x^0), and we are now left with a constant as a solution.

But the constant 6 isn’t the end of the line. No, it can still be differentiated one more time. In abstract calculus, when we perform our fourth and final differentiation of x^3 via differentiating the constant 6, we find that we end up at zero. Now, when I was first learning this on Khan Academy, I didn’t remember what was written in *How to Create the Universe *about how the differentiation of a constant in ontological calculus differs from the differentiation of a constant in abstract calculus. I originally thought that the differentiation of a constant being zero meant that ontologically, at that point in time, the mathematical function had lost all dimensionality and returned back to the Monadic Collective, which is a zero dimension Fourier frequency domain outside of space and time.

However, I’m now currently rereading *How to Create the Universe, *and I’m seeing that the way abstract calculus differentiates a constant is incorrect. The zero result of abstract calculus isn’t referring to ontological, dynamic, and full zero (i.e. the Monadic Collective) at all. No, the zero result of abstract calculus is referring to abstract, static, and empty zero, which equates to nonexistence, which, by definition, doesn’t exist. The zero result of abstract calculus means absolutely nothing, hence is non-ontological, hence is pointless.

In ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant such as 6 is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing. This would constitute a loss of information which equates to the destruction of *energy. *The destruction of energy is impossible. Energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it is eternal. The only thing you can do with energy is rearrange it in infinite ways. So again, in ontological calculus, when a dimensional constant within space and time is differentiated, it doesn’t become nothing; no, on the contrary, it becomes a dimensionless constant outside of space and time, within the domain of frequency. So if we were to differentiate our example constant of *dimensional *spacetime 6, it would produce a constant of *dimensionless* frequency 6 as a result.

A return to frequency equates to a return to the Cosmic Mind, i.e. a return to the Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time. A return to frequency equates to a return to dynamic, ontological, full zero, which is the origin of mathematics and the *container *for absolutely everything. A return to frequency equates to a return to pure *Light.*

Do you see what just happened here? We went from a relatively complicated, dimensional expression like x^3, and, through the mathematical operation of differentiation, we ended up back at ontological zero, i.e. the Monadic Collective. In other words, if we equate the mathematical expression x^3 to something that exists ontologically and dimensionally within space and time, then we can see that differentiation allows us to continuously subtract dimensions until we arrive back at the frequency domain of dynamic and full zero. In still other words, via differentiation, we were able to take an n-dimensional thing and turn it into a zero dimensional thing. Such is the power of calculus.

Ontological zero is the origin of everything. Ontological zero is the home of the mind, the soul, and the entire Monadic Collective. Ontological zero *is *the Monadic Collective. Ontological zero is the container for ALL of mathematics, hence it is the container for *reality*. Ontological zero is how mathematics actually exists within the universe. Ontological zero is the origin of mathematics, hence it is the origin of *everything.* Ontological zero is the absolute Truth of the universe, and it explains everything about the universe.

Next, since I still have a lot of work left to do in the abstract integral calculus course on Khan Academy, let’s just take a very quick look at ontological integral calculus. Integral calculus is the reverse of differential calculus. Where differentiation moves us down the dimensionality stepladder, integration moves us up it. It is via ontological integration that the universe adds mathematical dimensionality to itself.

Integration can be thought of as the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things, things such as the Myriad ontological flowing point particles which, via their perfect circular trajectories, trace out eternal and ontological unit circles outside of space and time. These Myriad point particles form the Myriad monads which form the Monadic Collective Singularity of pure light, which, once again, is located outside of space and time. Ontological integration is the mathematical operation that controls the *Big Bang *that scientific materialism likes to talk about. This operation can be seen at the very beginning of integral calculus when you first start to learn about Riemann sums.

The idea of integration and the integral is tied closely to the notion of differentiation and the derivative. Where differentiation allows us to take a dimensional, spacetime function and differentiate it to find its zero dimension, frequency function derivative, integration allows us to first start with a zero dimension, frequency function derivative, and then, via the operation of integration, discover the original function whose derivative it is (i.e. integration allows us to find a derivative’s anti-derivative). In other words, ontological differential calculus takes something in space and time and returns it to frequency, while ontological integral calculus takes something out of frequency and places it inside of space and time (though in Truth nothing is ever actually able to leave frequency; the feeling of being in a material body within space and time is a mathematically generated *illusion*).

With left and right Riemann sums, we can begin to get an inkling of how the universe builds something out of “nothing”. In integral calculus, a Riemann sum allows us to discover the area under a curve. This area is created, as I mentioned above, by the summing up of an infinite number of infinitesimally small things. If we equate the area under a curve to a dimensional something, and if we equate the infinite number of infinitesimally small things to dimensionless somethings (i.e. *nothings*), then we can begin to see how integration adds dimsionality to reality, and eventually creates the whole universe of space, time and matter.

So, to recapitulate this section. Ontological calculus is a stepladder leading from non-dimension to dimension, and back again. Via integration, calculus allows us to add dimensionality. This adding of dimensionality through integration equates to the *Big Bang. *Integration is what allows the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity of pure frequency outside of space and time to expand itself (i.e. to add dimensions to itself) into the six dimensional domain of space and time that we all are currently inhabiting.

Via differentiation, calculus allows us to subtract dimensions until we return to a dimensionless, frequency existence. If the adding of dimensions through integration equates to a Big Bang, then the subtracting of dimensions through differentiation equates to a Big Crunch*. *Ontological differentiation is the compression of space, time and matter back into the dimensionless Singularity from whence they came. It is when the dimensionless, Monadic Collective Singularity outside of space and time decides to fold itself back up, and compress all of its dimensions back into ontological zero.

Differentiation and integration are constantly in operation throughout the universe, and together they form the feedback loop which we call mind and matter. As Mike Hockney says in *How to Create the Universe*: “Calculus is a process linking mind to matter”. Once humanity understands everything there is to know about ontological calculus, it will ipso facto understand everything there is to know about mind, matter, life, and so-called “death”.

So, as you can see, if you want all of the answers to the universe, you have no other choice but to study mathematics ontologically, and this all begins with studying the work of the Pythagorean Illuminati. One day soon, ontological mathematics will usher in the golden age of the human race. That day can’t arrive fast enough.

**Ontological Mathematics Will Immanentize The Eschaton**

“Descartes himself was certain of the existence of unextended, dimensionless thinking substance, yet it does not feature at all in his own Cartesian grid. This can be rectified at a stroke by replacing the “empty” Cartesian origin with a Fourier frequency domain: a Singularity composed of countless monads, each of which is a self-contained frequency domain = a mind, a soul.”–From the book *How to Create the Universe **(The God Series Book 32) *by Mike Hockney, a.k.a. The Pythagorean Illuminati.

The sooner the entire human race discovers and integrates ontological mathematics into their lives, the sooner we will all be free from the mental cages we have created for ourselves. Once we have freed ourselves from our self imposed fetters–fetters that are keeping us all locked inside of good old Plato’s cave of ignorance–via the study of ontological mathematics, Illuminism, and Hyperianism, we will finally be able to understand the True meaning of the words *freedom *and *liberty. *At that point in time, humanity will at long last be in a position to *immanentize the eschaton*.

What does *immanentize the eschaton *mean? Well, it means creating heaven right here on Earth. Ontological mathematics is THE ONLY subject that will allow us human beings to create heaven on Earth for ALL people. It is THE ONLY subject that will allow us to finally be able to effectuate a Truly humanitarian society.

This humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the poisons of classism, racism, sexism, and homophobia.

It would be a society that is at last free from the evil 1%, a.k.a. the Old World Order, a.k.a. the ownership class, a.k.a. the elite, a.k.a. the biggest shit heads ever.

It would be a society that is at last free from the legions of idiotic, irrational, racist, sexist, homophobic, and troglodytic supporters of the psychopathic ownership class. Come on, you know the “people” I’m talking about. These are the army of greedy scum bags who would love nothing more than to have Donald “grab them by the pussy” Trump’s shriveled up orange dick stuffed down their throats. I’m of course talking about the traitorous lunatics we have euphemistically termed the* right-wing. *

A truly humanitarian society would be a society that is at last free from the anti-economic system hilariously called *free market capitalism.* Destructive, exploitative, wasteful, and oppressive free market crapitalism isn’t an economic system at all. How could it be? Economic systems are supposed to be *economical. *They’re supposed to be completely efficient systems that produce as close to zero waste and pollution as possible. They’re supposed to work in harmony with the planet and the environment. They’re supposed to be clear thinking, rational and logical systems that are fair and just to ALL. They’re supposed to be altruistic systems that work exclusively for the General Will of the People, and not for any particular human wills. They’re supposed to be built around reason, logic, and empirical evidence, all aimed at creating the most just and efficient human society possible. This is what True economic systems are supposed to be like.

True economic systems are absolutely not supposed to be like free market crapitalism. That is, they’re absolutely not supposed to be hyper-emotional, inefficient, wasteful, gluttonous, pollution and poison producing, violent machines of death and devastation *designed* to benefit only 1% of society at the expense of EVERYTHING else. This is why free market crapitalism is the exact opposite of a True economic system. It is the evil twin of a True economic system. It is what an economic system would look like on Bizarro World. It is what Peter Joseph calls a *plutonomy *(i.e. an economy controlled by the rich). It is an anti-economic system of the highest order, and it is destroying our world.

In truth, free market crapitalism is nothing more than a rigged game, a game created by and for the wealthy so that they can continue to rob the poor and impoverished, just as they have always done. Free market crapitalism is simply the latest (and greatest) ploy by the avaricious, rapacious, and insane rich to further line their own pockets. Free market crapitalism is the exact means the parasitical and vampiric 1% ownership class use to suck the blood out of 99% of humanity. When will we wake the fuck up and put an end to this ridiculous monstrosity.

Free market crapitalism is right up there in the running with its two close relatives–Mythos religion and scientific materialism–for the deadliest thing to ever befall the human race. Always remember, the insane crapitalists and the insane religious could never doll out the sheer amount of violence they do on a daily basis without the hard work of the robotic scientific materialists backing them up. Free market crapitalism, scientific materialism, and Mythos religion–has there ever been a more unholy triumvirate? It is this irrational and downright evil triumvirate that constitutes the right-wing, and it is this triumvirate that MUST be stopped if humanity is to have any future at all worth living in.

When humanity is at last able to immanentize the eschaton via the study of ontological mathematics, scientific materialism and Mythos religion will become things of the past, just like free market crapitalism, the rich, and all of the traitors who support the rich.

Speaking of traitors who support the rich, let’s not forget about the good old liberals. Liberals were created by the ownership class so that free market consumer crapitalism could flourish. Liberals are out and out free market crapitalists. They are just as dangerous and irrational as their conservative counterparts. None of these “liberal” people seek the destruction of free market crapitalism. No, on the contrary, liberals want to see free market crapitalism stay firmly in place. They can’t get enough of it. They’re junkies and they’re addicted to their junk.

Nothing sums these liberal shit heads up better than a quote from one of their risible leaders–the multi-millionaire Nancy Pelosi. When Pelosi was asked by a college student whether or not the Democratic Party was willing to jettison free market crapitalism because of the massive amount of inequality it NATURALLY creates, she replied: “I have to say, we’re capitalists, that’s just the way it is”. So there you have it, straight from the psychopaths mouth. The so-called liberal Democrats are straight up free market crapitalists. They never have and never will given a single shit for the the People.

So, in a Truly humanitarian society, neither liberals nor conservatives will exist any longer. They will be jettisoned along with their “two” party system of “democratic” free market crapitalism. Of course, there is only one party to vote for in this rigged system, the party of the rich elite. Democrats and Republicans are cut from the exact same motherfucking cloth, the cloth of free market crapitalism. They are all plutocrats, kleptocrats, oligarchs, and kakistocrats

True democracy is immiscible with free market crapitalism. True democracy is all about people power. It is all about the General Will and The Common Good. Free market crapitalism, on the other hand, is all about money power. It is all about the particular wills of the people with the money. It has absolutely no care whatsoever for humanity or the planet. Again, because it simply can’t be said enough: The ONLY thing free market crapitalism cares about is making more and more money for those who already have more money than they could ever possibly need or spend in one thousand lifetimes.

In a truly humanitarian and democratic society, there can be no political parties or factions. Parties and factions serve to divide and fragment a society. They turn what would otherwise be a progressive, united, harmonious, cooperative and far-sighted positive liberty society into a regressive, reactionary, fractured, bellicose, uncooperative and short-sighted negative liberty society. Political parties and factions tear societies apart. All candidates for government office should be independent experts in a particular field that benefits society as a whole.

What I have written in the brief paragraphs above is just a taste of what our New World will be like once we are able to use ontological mathematics to immanentize the eschaton. It will be a New World free form ALL the evils and ills of the past. It will be a New World where humanity has revalued ALL values.

Our New World will produce a Truly just and humanitarian one world global society for the first time in human history. This New Society will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by the Pythagorean Illuminati in all of their many spectacular books. It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Jacque Fresco and his awe-inspiring *Venus Project. * It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described by Peter Joseph in his extraordinary new book *The New Human Rights Movement. *It will be a Truly just and humanitarian society such as the beautiful society described and depicted in Gene Roddenberry’s wondrous *Star Trek *stories. I could go on but I think you get the point.

Building Truly progressive, economical, fair, and just societies and economies is really the only thing human beings should be focused on at the moment. We can make no further progress when it comes to exploring, discovering, and learning the Truth of ourselves and our incredible universe (which is the only rational definition of human progress) until we create societies designed for just this purpose. These societies MUST be fair and just to all. They MUST eradicate ALL unnecessary fear, stress, and anxiety within the human race so that people can finally be free to learn, create, discover, progress, grow, and ultimately optimize themselves and their communities.

To immanentize the eschaton is the purpose of humanity. Indeed, it is the purpose of ALL conscious minds within the universe. Shouldn’t we all be working to fulfill our purpose for existing? Isn’t that what we should all be striving towards? Fuck making money. Fuck praying to a psychopathic sky wizard who orders and accepts the sacrifice of human beings. Fuck meditating. Stop wasting time. Get to studying ontological mathematics so that we can finally immanentize the eschaton and create a New World Order where reason, logic, mathematics, creativity, merit, art, wisdom, intelligence, altruism, compassion, and equal opportunity for ALL people rules the day. I’m ready right now to start building heaven here on Earth–are you with me?

**ONTOLOGICAL MATHEMATICS, PYTHAGOREANISM, HYPERIANISM, AND JACOBINISM FOR ALL AND FOREVER!!!**

**Important Links For Ontological Mathematicians, New Jacobins, Hyperians, Progressive Left-Wingers, Rationalists, Pythagorean Illuminists, And Anyone Else Fighting For Social Justice And A Better Future For All Of Humanity
**

The website that introduced humanity to the Truth of the universe: http://armageddonconspiracy.co.uk/

The sacred and revolutionary books of Hyperrationalism, Pythagoreanism, Ontological Mathematics, Social Capitalism, 100% Inheritance Tax, Left Wing Meritocracy, Jacobinism, and SO much more. These are the books that contain the blueprint for a New World Order based on the ontological mathematical Truth of existence. They are Truly the only books that the hard/progressive/rational left need to read:

The books by Mike Hockney: https://www.amazon.com/Mike-Hockney/e/B004KHR7DC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1487979156&sr=8-1

The books by Adam Weishaupt: https://www.amazon.com/Adam-Weishaupt/e/B004LXB8GW/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The books by Michael Faust: https://www.amazon.com/Michael-Faust/e/B004LXBBUA/ref=ntt_aut_sim_2_1

The Pythagorean Illuminati have recently released many new books under a few new pseudonyms. Here is a quick article I wrote that contains links to the new books and author names: https://sacredcause.com/2017/04/06/a-list-of-new-books-written-by-the-pythagorean-illuminati/

The Meritocracy Site: https://www.meritocrats.org/

Facebook contact page for the Pythagorean Illuminati: https://www.facebook.com/pythagorean.illuminati/

*Hyperianism *is a beautiful system of thought based on ontological mathematics. If you seek to lift yourself and all of humanity up to a higher, happier, more fulfilled, more rational, and more compassionate level of existence, then become a Hyperian. Learn more at this amazing website: https://www.hyperianism.com/

A brand new website dedicated to the books by Mike Hockney, Adam Weishaupt, and Micheal Faust. This site was created by people who had their lives changed by the only True religion: Pythagoreanism/ontological mathematics. The purpose of this site is to help bring Pythagoreanism into the public consciousness. The group who created the site is called *The Apollo Institute of Reason *(AIR). Here is a link: http://themeritocracyparty.net/

The amazing Khan Academy website (completely free to use). This site will take you from elementary mathematics all the way through calculus and beyond. I can’t say enough about this site. If you are a burgeoning ontological mathematician like I am, then this is the site for you: https://www.khanacademy.org/

Patrick JMT (just math tutoring) also completely free to use: An excellent site that will add even more to what you are learning on Khan Academy. Some of Patrick’s awesome math videos are now a part of Khan Academy’s math curriculum too! Check it out:

http://patrickjmt.com/

Some very cool blogs, YouTube channels, and websites that are inspired by Pythagoreanism, Hyperianism, Jacobinism, and Ontological Mathematics. Check them out:

http://lejacobin.net/mathematics.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgDhHvyV16HSnC0ko6-K3nA

https://hex666blog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIo67yG6r8UGNltuwM10gSA

https://nocelebritiesblog.wordpress.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk_Xj3Pjrs3X-UMaiSSnPFQ

https://illuminatenorden1776.wordpress.com/

https://enlightenedhumanity.wordpress.com/

https://www.blackspotmutiny.com/

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCRr9mh4Z9xiW4F9rC59jdEQ/feed

http://templeofmathematics.com/Mathematicon.html

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2Ute1a5xGvSypIUWFhnlRQ

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC2SXdU9VDTaJPbD-N4_iSpg

Links to the amazing work of Peter Joseph, Jacque Fresco, The Zeitgeist Movement, and The Venus Project. The world that these great people are working to create is the same kind of world ontological mathematics is working to create:

https://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/

https://www.thevenusproject.com/

https://www.amazon.com/Peter-Joseph/e/B01N9JUPIC/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512145883&sr=8-1

https://www.amazon.com/Jacque-Fresco/e/B001K8WGN0/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1512146065&sr=8-1

Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, Abrahamism, Activism, Adam Weishaupt, Alt-Right, Antifa, BJJ, Black Lives Matter, Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, Breitbart, Catholicism, Christianity, Content, Definition Of Mathematics, Diverse Monoculture, Dr. Thomas Stark, Dumbocalypse Now: The First Dunning Krugger President, Education, Euler's Formula, Euler's Formula And Special Relativity: The Deep Origins Of Space And Time, Form, Full Retard: The Dumbest Just Got Dumber, Godel Versus Wittgenstein, Godel's Incompleteness Theorems, Hegel, Hypatia, Hyperianism, Illuminati, Illuminism, Immanentize The Eschaton, Immanuel Kant, islam, Jack Tanner, Jacobinism, Joe Dixon, Judaism, Khan Academy, Kill God: The Hunt For The Cosmic War Criminal, Kurt Godel, Left Wing, Left-Wing Meritocracy, Leibniz, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Mark Romel, Mathematical Semantics, Mathematical Synatx, Mathematics, Meritocracy, Michael Faust, Mike Hockney, Mind, Mixed Martial Arts, MMA, Monad, Monadic Mathematics, New World Order, One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined, Ontological Mathematics, Philosophy, Plato, Psychophysics, Pythagoras, Pythagorean Illuminati, Pythagorean Illuminism, Pythagorean Illuminism/Ontological Mathematics, Pythagoreanism, Ranty McRanterson, Rational Social Justice Activism, Raţionalism, Science, Science's War On Reason, Scientific Rationalism And Idealism, Self-Defense For Rational Social Justice Activists, Social Capitalism, Social Justice, Soul, Souls, Tags: 100% Inheritance Tax, The Book Of Thought: Mind Matters (The Truth Series Book 6), The Divine Equation, The Forbidden History Of Science, The God Equation, The God Series, The Goddess Equation, The Holographic Soul, The Language Of Reality: The Answer To Existence (The Truth Series Book 4), The Liberty Wars: The Trump Time Bomb, The Mind Equation, The Sacred Books Of The Pythagorean Illuminati, The Soul Equation, The Thinking Universe: Energy Is Thought (The Truth Series Book 3), The Truth Series, The Unit Circle, The War Of The Ghosts And The Machines, Tom Strabo, Transcendental Mathematics, What Is A Thought?: The Ontology Of ThinkingCategories: "The God Series" By Mike Hockney